Michael Geerts vs Tibo Colson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Over the past six months, Geerts has shown a slightly stronger performance in second serve points, securing 46.58%, compared to Colson's 43.89%. This aspect often correlates highly with match outcome forecasts. Geerts has also excelled in first serve return, capturing 24.38% of points, whereas Colson achieved 20.27% in the same category.

Return game statistics highlight Colson's ability to win 46.34% of their opponent's second-serve points, edging out Geerts, who managed 45.3%. In high-pressure situations, particularly when facing breakpoints, Colson has demonstrated resilience, saving 59.23% in comparison to Geerts' 52.05%. These numbers can be crucial for in-game betting predictions.

Examining overall match performance over the previous year reveals that Geerts has won 58.62% of their matches (W/L 51/36), nearly mirroring Colson's win rate of 58.33% (W/L 35/25). Geerts shows a proclivity for hard surfaces, with a career win rate of 62% (W/L 181/110) on this surface. Conversely, Colson exhibits notable success on indoor hard courts with a 66% win rate (W/L 50/26).

When evaluating the quality of opponents, Geerts faced adversaries averaging a rank of 372.55, while Colson's opponents averaged a rank of 452.2. This difference signals Geerts' exposure to more challenging competition. In matches requiring a deciding set, Colson surpassed Geerts, winning 54% of those sets over the last year compared to Geerts' 46%.

Surface preference also highlights player strengths, with Colson being less successful on clay, holding a 50% win rate (W/L 39/39). Geerts, however, struggled on grass, failing to win any matches (W/L 0/2). The level of events played is crucial, too, as Geerts participated mostly in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 49.06% of matches, whereas Colson competed mainly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, obtaining a stronger win ratio of 63.64%.

Break point conversion rate further distinguishes the two, with Geerts successfully converting 34.81% of break points, a slight advantage over Colson's 28.35%. Taking all statistical insights into account, Geerts has a marginal edge and is more likely to emerge as the winner in this matchup. With attention to current event performances, pending any latest changes, this analysis provides a comprehensive forecast for the forthcoming clash.